Judge Less, Pray More – Letter from Alan Chambers for November 2012

Alan ChambersEveryone is clamoring for the No. 1 spot in the great gay Christian debate. For some, it isn’t enough that people hold to a traditional, conservative, and biblical sexual ethic; they also want to emphasize that homosexual sexual expression is more egregious than other sexual sins and deserves greater judgment and eternal consequence. Others insist that there are no scriptural mandates limiting homosexual sexual expression for believers. While most of us would never even question heterosexual sexual ethics, some seem fine with making special exceptions for the gay or lesbian person.

The arguments are never-ending, one-dimensional, and secondary, at best, in the grand scheme of things. None of this is rocket science. I am not a Bible scholar (though I greatly appreciate them and their role in my life and in this discussion), but I am a believer in the one true Christ and nothing gets more attention or time in my life than He does. While “theologian” isn’t in my title, I do take studying God’s Word seriously and read it more than anything else. So, as others identify as Wesleyan Arminian Christians, Calvinist Christians, Anabaptist Christians, gay or ex-gay Christians, I have to admit I am just, simply, irrevocably, a Christian.

John 3:16 states, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life [emphasis mine].” It is this verse that the majority of end-zone evangelists use to win people to Jesus. No one in Christendom—to my knowledge—is up in arms about this common practice or commonly used verse. And, while I don’t hear anyone in recent days arguing over who can come to Christ, I do hear plenty of people arguing over who can stay in Him.

Let’s go deeper. Read Romans 6—all of it. It’s abundantly clear: believers are no longer slaves to sin but to righteousness. That means we have been sanctified—made righteous—completely. It does not say in Romans or any other place that we won’t sin; it says that because of who we are in Christ, sin is not our master—even if we make it so.

To be sure, any sexual expression outside of a heterosexual monogamous marriage is sin. Grace isn’t a license to sin. To claim grace as if it is only a get-out-of-jail-free card is a misuse of its unequaled power to free. It’s like using a pressure washer to water the plants; it can do that, but it was designed to do abundantly more.

For anyone to condemn one group of people with a certain set of proclivities while ignoring or, worse yet, exonerating another group with proclivities is wrong. This hypocrisy confuses and angers people.  Can a believer persist in willful pride and still inherit the kingdom of God? Can a believer persist in willful alcoholism and still inherit the kingdom of God? Can a believer persist in willful gluttony and still inherit the kingdom of God? Can a believer persist in willful heterosexual pornography and still inherit the kingdom of God? If you aren’t consistently and regularly calling all sin sinful, and calling all people (including yourself) to holy living, then how can you do so for those living homosexually? And, if you are unwilling to pronounce the same eternal sanctions on all willfully sinning believers as you do on the gay and lesbian willful sinner, how can you justify that?

If we exercised church discipline across the board based on the outward and inward sin running rampant in the body of Christ, there would be no one left. So, do we ignore sin? In the words of Paul: “May it never be.” Matthew 7:1-5 says it so well:

Do not judge so that you will not be judged. For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, “Let me take the speck out of your eye,” and behold, the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.

I doubt there will ever be human resolution to the debates surrounding eternal security, whether or not someone can be actively gay and a believer, or so many of the other weighty and divisive controversies plaguing our congregations. But I hope there will be a genuine desire to proclaim the truth of what God is for. I hope that we will all take personal holiness more seriously than we do. I hope that we will seek to judge less and pray more remembering that a person’s faith in Christ is between them and God and not up for human judgment. I believe we have an opportunity here, as believers across the great divide of Christendom, to seek Christ above all else—whether in our sexual identity or our doctrinal identity. 

%d bloggers like this: